The chain ladder or development method is a prominent actuarial loss reserving technique. The chain ladder method is used in both the property and casualty and health insurance fields. Its intent is to estimate Incurred But Not Reported or IBNR reserves are a part of claims reserves estimated by insurers for reporting on their financial statements. Claims reserves are estimates of claims that have occurred on or before the financial statement report date but which have yet to be paid. This a current lia... claims and project ultimate loss amounts. The primary underlying assumption of the chain ladder method is that historical loss development patterns are indicative of future loss development patterns.
BREAKING DOWN Chain Ladder Method (CLM)
The chain ladder method calculates Incurred But Not Reported or IBNR reserves are a part of claims reserves estimated by insurers for reporting on their financial statements. Claims reserves are estimates of claims that have occurred on or before the financial statement report date but which have yet to be paid. This a current lia... (IBNR) loss estimates, using run-off triangles of paid losses and incurred losses, representing the sum of paid losses and case reserves. Insurance companies are required to set aside a portion of the premiums they receive from their underwriting activities to pay for claims that may be filed in the future. The amount of claims forecasted, along with the amount of claims that are actually paid, determine how much profit the insurer will publish in its financial documents.
Reserve triangles are two-dimensional matrices that are generated by accumulating claim data over a period of time. The claim data is run through a stochastic process to create the run-off matrices after allowing for many degrees of freedom.
At its core, the chain ladder method operates under the assumption that patterns in claims activities in the past will continue to be seen in the future. In order for this assumption to hold, data from past loss experiences must be accurate. Several factors can impact accuracy, including changes to the product offerings, regulatory and legal changes, periods of high Severity refers to the amount you have received Insurance claim for. Average Severity would be the loss associated with an average Insurance claim. claims, and changes in the claims settlement process. If the assumptions built into the model differ from observed claims, insurers may have to make adjustments to the model.
Creating estimations can be difficult because random fluctuations in claims data and a small data set can result in forecasting errors. To smooth over these problems, insurers combine both company claims data with data from the industry in general.null
According to Jacqueline Friedland’s “Estimating Unpaid Claims Using Basic Techniques,” there are seven steps to apply the chain ladder technique:
- Compile claims data in a development triangle
- Calculate age-to-age factors
- Calculate averages of the age-to-age factors
- Select claim development factors
- Select tail factor
- Calculate cumulative claim development factors
- Project ultimate claims
Age-to-age factors, also called loss development factors (LDFs) or link ratios, represent the ratio of loss amounts from one valuation date to another, and they are intended to capture growth patterns of losses over time. These factors are used to project where the ultimate amount losses will settle.
Example of Chain Ladder Method
First, losses (either reported or paid) are compiled into a triangle, where the rows represent accident years and the columns represent valuation dates. For example, 43,169,009 represents loss amounts related to claims occurring in 1998, valued as of 24 months.
Next, age-to-age factors are determined by calculating the ratio of losses at subsequent valuation dates. From 24 months to 36 months, accident year 1998 losses increased from 43,169,009 to 45,568,919, so the corresponding age-to-age factor is 45,568,919 / 43,169,009 = 1.056. A “tail factor” is selected (in this case, 1.000) to project from the latest valuation age to ultimate.
|Accident year||12-24||24-36||36-48||48-60||60-72||72-84||84-96||96-108||108-120||To ult|
Finally, averages of the age-to-age factors are calculated. Judgmental selections are made after observing several averages. The age-to-age factors are then multiplied together to obtain cumulative development factors.
|Simple average last 5 years||1.168||1.058||1.027||1.011||1.004||1.003||1.002||1.001||1.000|
|Simple average last 3 years||1.164||1.056||1.027||1.012||1.005||1.003||1.002||1.001||1.000|
|Volume weighted last 5 years||1.168||1.058||1.027||1.011||1.004||1.003||1.002||1.001||1.000|
|Volume weighted last 3 years||1.164||1.056||1.027||1.012||1.005||1.003||1.002||1.001||1.000|
|Cumulative to ultimate||1.292||1.110||1.051||1.023||1.011||1.006||1.003||1.001||1.000||1.000|
The cumulative development factors multiplied by the reported (or paid) losses to project ultimate losses.
|Accident year||Reported claims||Development factor to ultimate||Projected ultimate claims|
Incurred but not reported can be obtained by subtracting reported losses from ultimate losses, in this case, 569,172,456 – 543,481,587 = 25,690,869.
Learn Excel or Python/R for Data Science
Best Python & R in Data Science course
Machine Learning A-Z™: Hands-On Python & R In Data Science
Best Excel course
Microsoft Excel – Excel from Beginner to Advanced.